chore: initial monorepo scaffold + WDS Phase 1+2 artifacts

- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24)
- apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004)
- apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM)
- libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base
- Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit
- WDS artifacts:
  - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs)
  - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact)
- Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md
- AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/skills/wds-5-agentic-development/workflow-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+---
+name: analysis
+description: Understand an existing codebase through systematic exploration
+---
+
+# [A] Analysis — Understand Your Own Codebase
+
+**Goal:** Systematically explore and document an existing codebase's architecture, patterns, and dependencies.
+
+**When to use:** Joining an existing project. Need to understand code before making changes. Architecture documentation is missing or outdated. Preparing for a major refactor or migration.
+
+---
+
+## CORE PRINCIPLES
+
+- **Question-driven** — Every analysis starts with a clear question. Without a question, exploration is aimless. Define what you need to know before reading a single file.
+- **Systematic** — Follow a structured path: question, scan, map, document. Do not jump to conclusions from reading one file. Cover breadth before going deep.
+- **Document everything** — Findings that are not written down are lost. Every observation, pattern, risk, and recommendation goes into the output document. The analysis document becomes a team asset.
+
+---
+
+## INITIALIZATION
+
+### Design Log
+Read `{output_folder}/_progress/00-design-log.md`. Check Current and Backlog for context.
+
+### Essential Guides
+
+- **[Execution Principles](data/guides/EXECUTION-PRINCIPLES.md)** — Document before acting, plan-then-execute
+- **[Session Protocol](data/guides/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md)** — Read dialog, verify plan, present status
+
+---
+
+## STEPS
+
+Execute steps in `./steps-a/`:
+
+| Step | File | Purpose |
+|------|------|---------|
+| 01 | step-01-define-question.md | Articulate the question, define scope and output |
+| 02 | step-02-scan-codebase.md | Scan structure, tech stack, entry points |
+| 03 | step-03-map-architecture.md | Map components, data flow, dependencies |
+| 04 | step-04-document-findings.md | Create architecture document with diagrams |
+
+**Flow:** 01 → 02 → 03 → 04
+
+### Critical Rules
+
+- **ALWAYS** start with a clear question before scanning code
+- **ALWAYS** document observations as you go, not from memory at the end
+- **ALWAYS** define scope boundaries to avoid unbounded exploration
+- **ALWAYS** set a time box to prevent analysis paralysis
+- **ALWAYS** produce a concrete output document, not just verbal findings
+
+---
+
+## AFTER COMPLETION
+
+1. Append a progress entry to `{output_folder}/_progress/00-design-log.md` under `## Progress`:
+   `### [date] — Analysis: [what was analyzed, key findings]`
+2. Suggest next action: feed into development, reverse engineer further, or start prototyping