Files
sar/.claude/skills/bmad-testarch-atdd/resources/knowledge/webhook-testing-fundamentals.md
julian 17c08e6392 chore: initial monorepo scaffold + WDS Phase 1+2 artifacts
- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24)
- apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004)
- apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM)
- libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base
- Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit
- WDS artifacts:
  - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs)
  - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact)
- Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md
- AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 14:34:20 +00:00

3.1 KiB

Webhook Testing Fundamentals

Principle

Webhook delivery is eventually consistent — your application fires HTTP callbacks asynchronously after events occur. Tests must poll until the expected webhook arrives or time out. The @seontechnologies/playwright-utils webhook module provides deterministic polling, typed matchers, rich timeout diagnostics, and cleanup strategies safe under fullyParallel: true.

Rationale

Webhook tests fail for four structural reasons:

  • Eventually consistent: Webhook delivery happens asynchronously — you cannot assert immediately after triggering an event
  • Parallel journal pollution: When multiple workers share the same mock server, a fast worker's teardown can delete records a slow worker is still polling
  • Opaque timeouts: A bare timeout tells you only that the webhook didn't arrive — it shows you nothing about what did arrive
  • Cleanup drift: Resetting the full journal in afterEach creates a race condition under fullyParallel: true

The playwright-utils approach:

  • Polling via recurse: Uses Playwright's expect.poll under the hood — retries with configurable timeout and interval until a match is found
  • Typed matchers: matchField, matchPartial, matchPredicate — all must pass (AND semantics); matchers never throw on missing paths
  • Rich timeout errors: WebhookTimeoutError carries totalReceived, receivedWebhooks, and matcherDetails so you can see what arrived vs. what was expected
  • Isolation via startedAt: Each WebhookRegistry instance records its creation timestamp; polling only fetches webhooks received after that point, preventing leakage from prior tests
  • Two cleanup strategies: full-reset (resets entire journal) and matched-only (deletes only matched webhooks — parallel-safe when the provider supports delete-by-ID, e.g. WireMock)

When to Use Webhook Tests

Scenario Use webhook tests
Application publishes events to external subscribers Required
Event-driven architecture with Kafka/event bus → webhook delivery Required
Payment, order, or notification side effects via webhooks Required
Testing that a webhook was NOT delivered Verify via timeout
Polling a status endpoint for eventual consistency Use recurse directly
Frontend receiving push notifications (WebSocket) Different mechanism
  • webhook-module-setup.md — Fixture wiring and cleanup strategies
  • webhook-template-matchers.md — matchField, matchPartial, matchPredicate
  • webhook-waiting-querying.md — waitFor, waitForCount, getReceived, drain pattern
  • webhook-timeout-error.md — WebhookTimeoutError debugging
  • webhook-providers.md — WireMock, MockServer, Mockoon, custom provider
  • webhook-risk-guidance.md — Risk-based guidance for TA and TD capabilities