Files
sar/.claude/skills/bmad-testarch-test-design/validation-report-20260127-102401.md
julian 17c08e6392 chore: initial monorepo scaffold + WDS Phase 1+2 artifacts
- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24)
- apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004)
- apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM)
- libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base
- Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit
- WDS artifacts:
  - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs)
  - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact)
- Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md
- AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 14:34:20 +00:00

3.7 KiB

validationDate: 2026-01-27 workflowName: testarch-test-design workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/bmad-testarch-test-design validationStatus: COMPLETE completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01

Validation Report: testarch-test-design

Validation Started: 2026-01-27 10:24:01 Validator: BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex) Standards Version: BMAD Workflow Standards

File Structure & Size

  • workflow.md present: YES
  • instructions.md present: YES
  • workflow.yaml present: YES
  • step files found: 8

Step File Sizes:

  • steps-c/step-01-detect-mode.md: 92 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-c/step-02-load-context.md: 111 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-c/step-03-risk-and-testability.md: 75 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-c/step-04-coverage-plan.md: 87 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-c/step-05-generate-output.md: 84 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
  • steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
  • workflow-plan.md present: YES

Frontmatter Validation

  • No frontmatter violations found

Critical Path Violations

Config Variables (Exceptions)

Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name

  • No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body

  • No dead relative links detected

  • No module path assumptions detected

Status: PASS - No critical violations

Menu Handling Validation

  • No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]

Step Type Validation

  • steps-c/step-01-detect-mode.md: Init [PASS]
  • steps-c/step-02-load-context.md: Middle [PASS]
  • steps-c/step-03-risk-and-testability.md: Middle [PASS]
  • steps-c/step-04-coverage-plan.md: Middle [PASS]
  • steps-c/step-05-generate-output.md: Final [PASS]
  • Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]

Output Format Validation

  • Templates present: test-design-architecture-template.md, test-design-qa-template.md, test-design-template.md
  • Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
    • steps-c/step-05-generate-output.md
    • steps-v/step-01-validate.md
  • checklist.md present: YES

Validation Design Check

  • Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
  • Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
  • Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed

Instruction Style Check

  • Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
  • Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance

Collaborative Experience Check

  • Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
  • Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
  • Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals

Subagent Optimization Opportunities

  • No high-priority subagent optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
  • Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
  • Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
  • Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
  • Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only

Cohesive Review

  • Overall assessment: GOOD
  • Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
  • Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
  • Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)

Plan Quality Validation

  • Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
  • Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
  • Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented

Summary

  • Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
  • Critical issues: 0
  • Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
  • Readiness: READY (manual review optional)