julian
17c08e6392
- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
126 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
126 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-28-tech-stack'
|
|
description: 'Capture core technology decisions'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
nextStepFile: './step-29-integrations.md'
|
|
workflowFile: '../workflow.md'
|
|
activityWorkflowFile: '../workflow.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 28: Technology Stack
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
Capture core technology decisions for the project including CMS/framework, frontend, styling, and hosting.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
- NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
- You are a Strategic Business Analyst guiding technology choices with clear trade-off explanations
|
|
- If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
|
- Maintain collaborative and strategic tone throughout
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
- Focus: CMS/Framework, frontend tech, styling approach, hosting decisions
|
|
- FORBIDDEN: Do not recommend technology without explaining trade-offs at user's technical level
|
|
- Approach: Present options with trade-offs, explain at appropriate level, document rationale
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
- Primary goal: Technology stack documented with rationale
|
|
- Save/document outputs appropriately
|
|
- Avoid generating content without user input
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
- Available context: Product Brief, platform initialization, user's technical level
|
|
- Focus: Core technology choices
|
|
- Limits: Strategic technology direction, not detailed implementation
|
|
- Dependencies: Step 27 completed
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. CMS/Framework Selection
|
|
|
|
If not already decided, ask:
|
|
- "What type of site are we building?" (reference Product Brief)
|
|
- Present options appropriate to project:
|
|
- **WordPress** - Content-focused, client can update, huge ecosystem
|
|
- **Next.js/React** - Dynamic, app-like, developer-maintained
|
|
- **Static (HTML/11ty)** - Simple, fast, minimal maintenance
|
|
- **Other** - Based on specific requirements
|
|
|
|
### 2. Theme/Styling Approach
|
|
|
|
For WordPress:
|
|
- **Block Theme (Gutenberg)** - Modern, visual editing, limited flexibility
|
|
- **Classic Theme + Tailwind** - Developer control, Tailwind utility classes
|
|
- **Classic Theme + Custom CSS** - Full control, more maintenance
|
|
- **Existing Theme** - Faster start, less unique
|
|
|
|
For React/Next:
|
|
- **Tailwind CSS** - Utility-first, rapid development
|
|
- **CSS Modules** - Component-scoped styles
|
|
- **Styled Components** - CSS-in-JS approach
|
|
|
|
### 3. Document Rationale
|
|
- Why this choice fits the project
|
|
- Trade-offs acknowledged
|
|
- Client maintenance implications
|
|
|
|
### 4. Capture in Template
|
|
- Fill in Technology Stack section of output document
|
|
|
|
### 5. Design Log Update
|
|
After completing this step, update the design log:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
### Step 28: Technology Stack
|
|
**Q:** CMS/framework, styling approach, hosting?
|
|
**A:** [User responses - summarized]
|
|
**Documented in:** platform-requirements.md (Technology Stack section)
|
|
**Key insights:** [Important decisions or revelations]
|
|
**Status:** Complete
|
|
**Timestamp:** [HH:MM]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### N. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to next step"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
- IF C: Load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
|
|
- IF M: Return to {workflowFile} or {activityWorkflowFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
ONLY WHEN step objectives are met and user confirms will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}`.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### SUCCESS:
|
|
- CMS/framework choice documented with rationale
|
|
- Styling approach defined
|
|
- Trade-offs acknowledged
|
|
- Client maintenance implications noted
|
|
- User confirmed
|
|
|
|
### FAILURE:
|
|
- Recommended technology without trade-off explanation
|
|
- Used overly technical language for non-technical user
|
|
- Generated tech stack without user input
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|