- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
160 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
160 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-06d-generate-document'
|
|
description: 'Generate the complete Feature Impact Analysis document'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
nextStepFile: './step-06e-feature-wrap-up.md'
|
|
activityWorkflowFile: '../workflow.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 15: Generate Feature Impact Document
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
|
|
Generate the complete Feature Impact Analysis document with the confirmed assessment, including prioritization tiers, detailed rationale, strategic implications, and questions for the designer.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
|
|
- ✅ You are Saga the Analyst - documenting strategic priorities
|
|
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- ✅ You bring structured facilitation and pattern recognition, user brings business knowledge and user insight
|
|
- ✅ Work together as equals in a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Focus on generating complete, well-structured document
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to save without user review of summary
|
|
- 💬 Approach: Generate document, present summary, iterate if needed
|
|
- 📋 Use template from ../templates/feature-impact.template.md
|
|
- 📋 Include Must Have/Consider/Defer prioritization tiers
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Generate document following template structure
|
|
- 💾 Save to {output_folder}/B-Trigger-Map/feature-impact-analysis.md
|
|
- 📖 Present summary to user for review
|
|
- 🚫 Do not proceed until user confirms document
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
|
|
- Available context: Confirmed assessment scores, personas, driving forces
|
|
- Focus: Document generation with proper structure and rationale
|
|
- Limits: Use confirmed scores only - do not change assessment
|
|
- Dependencies: Requires confirmed assessment from step-06c
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. Generate Document
|
|
|
|
Use the template: `../templates/feature-impact.template.md`
|
|
|
|
Include:
|
|
1. **Header** with project name, date, and scoring legend
|
|
2. **Prioritized Features Table** with all scores
|
|
3. **Feature Details & Rationale** for each feature (especially top scorers)
|
|
4. **Strategic Implications** section
|
|
5. **Questions for Designer** section
|
|
|
|
**Prioritization Logic:**
|
|
|
|
**Must Have MVP:**
|
|
- Any feature where Primary Persona scored HIGH (5 pts)
|
|
- OR features with score >= (max_possible - 3)
|
|
|
|
**Consider for MVP:**
|
|
- Mid-range scores
|
|
- Strategic value but not critical
|
|
|
|
**Defer:**
|
|
- Low scores
|
|
- Minimal strategic value
|
|
|
|
### 2. Save Document
|
|
|
|
Save as: `{output_folder}/B-Trigger-Map/feature-impact-analysis.md`
|
|
|
|
### 3. Present Summary
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
"**Feature Impact Analysis Document Generated!**
|
|
|
|
**Saved to:** B-Trigger-Map/feature-impact-analysis.md
|
|
|
|
**Summary:**
|
|
|
|
**Must Have MVP Features ({{must_have_count}}):**
|
|
{{#each must_have}}
|
|
- {{this.name}} (Score: {{this.score}})
|
|
{{/each}}
|
|
|
|
**Consider for MVP ({{consider_count}}):**
|
|
{{#each consider}}
|
|
- {{this.name}} (Score: {{this.score}})
|
|
{{/each}}
|
|
|
|
**Key Insights:**
|
|
- [Strategic insight 1]
|
|
- [Strategic insight 2]
|
|
- [Strategic insight 3]
|
|
|
|
This Feature Impact Analysis serves as your **Design Brief** - it guides:
|
|
- **Phase 4: UX Design** - Which scenarios to design first
|
|
- **Phase 6: PRD/Development** - Epic and story prioritization
|
|
|
|
The document includes detailed rationale for each feature's scoring.
|
|
|
|
**Would you like to make any final adjustments, or are we good to proceed?**"
|
|
|
|
### 4. Handle Feedback
|
|
|
|
If user requests changes: Update document, regenerate, show summary again.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Workshop Wrap-Up | [M] Return to Activity Menu"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
- IF C: Load and execute {nextStepFile}
|
|
- IF M: Return to {activityWorkflowFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
|
|
ONLY WHEN user selects [C] will you load the next step file. Document must be generated and user must confirm before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
|
- Document generated following template structure
|
|
- All sections included (header, table, rationale, implications, questions)
|
|
- Prioritization tiers applied correctly (Must Have/Consider/Defer)
|
|
- Document saved to correct location
|
|
- Summary presented to user
|
|
- User confirmed or adjustments made and re-confirmed
|
|
|
|
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
|
- Document missing required sections
|
|
- Incorrect prioritization tier assignment
|
|
- Not saving to correct location
|
|
- Not presenting summary for user review
|
|
- Proceeding without user confirmation
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|