- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
140 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
140 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-04-implement'
|
|
description: 'Implement changes incrementally, verifying at each step'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
nextStepFile: './step-05-verify-and-document.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 4: Implement
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
|
|
Implement changes incrementally, verifying at each step.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
|
|
- ✅ You are an Implementation Partner guiding structured development activities
|
|
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- ✅ You bring software development methodology expertise, user brings domain knowledge and codebase familiarity
|
|
- ✅ Maintain clear and structured tone throughout
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Focus only on implementing each planned commit, testing after each, and ensuring backward compatibility
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip verification points or proceed with broken tests
|
|
- 💬 Approach: Execute each planned step methodically — implement, self-check, test, commit
|
|
- 📋 Backward compatibility must be verified at every commit
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 All planned steps implemented with passing tests and backward compatibility
|
|
- 💾 Update dialog file with implementation progress after each commit
|
|
- 📖 Reference the implementation plan from Step 3 and verification points
|
|
- 🚫 Do not proceed to next commit if current one is broken
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
|
|
- Available context: Scope from Step 1; risks from Step 2; implementation plan from Step 3
|
|
- Focus: Incremental implementation following the plan
|
|
- Limits: Only implement what is in the plan — no scope creep
|
|
- Dependencies: Step 3 must be complete (plan exists)
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. Create Feature Branch
|
|
|
|
- Branch from the current working branch
|
|
- Use a descriptive name: `feature/<short-description>` or `evolve/<feature-name>`
|
|
- Commit the branch before making changes
|
|
|
|
### 2. Implement Incrementally Per Plan
|
|
|
|
For each planned commit:
|
|
|
|
1. **Read the plan** — What does this step require?
|
|
2. **Implement** — Write the code for this step only
|
|
3. **Self-check** — Does this change stay within its planned scope?
|
|
4. **Test** — Run relevant tests, verify the step works
|
|
5. **Commit** — Clean commit with descriptive message
|
|
|
|
### 3. Test After Each Step
|
|
|
|
- Run the verification point defined in Step 03
|
|
- If automated tests exist, run them after each commit
|
|
- If modifying existing features, verify they still work (baseline comparison)
|
|
- Do not proceed to the next step if the current one is broken
|
|
|
|
### 4. Ensure Backward Compatibility at Each Commit
|
|
|
|
At every commit, ask:
|
|
- Does the existing functionality still work?
|
|
- Can an existing user do everything they could before?
|
|
- Are any existing API consumers affected?
|
|
- If a commit breaks backward compatibility, either fix it or add a feature flag
|
|
|
|
### 5. Use Feature Flags if Needed
|
|
|
|
When the plan calls for feature flags:
|
|
- Implement the flag check early (before building the feature behind it)
|
|
- Default to "off" — new feature is hidden until explicitly enabled
|
|
- Ensure the "off" path is identical to the pre-change behavior
|
|
- Test both flag states: on (new behavior) and off (old behavior)
|
|
|
|
### 6. Verify Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Feature branch created
|
|
- [ ] Each planned step implemented and committed separately
|
|
- [ ] Tests pass after each commit
|
|
- [ ] Backward compatibility verified at each commit
|
|
- [ ] Feature flags implemented correctly (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] Dialog file updated with implementation progress
|
|
|
|
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Step 5: Verify and Document"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
- IF C: Update design log, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
|
|
ONLY WHEN all planned steps are implemented, tested, and committed with backward compatibility verified will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
|
- Feature branch created
|
|
- Each planned step implemented and committed separately
|
|
- Tests pass after each commit
|
|
- Backward compatibility verified at each commit
|
|
- Feature flags implemented correctly (if applicable)
|
|
- Dialog file updated with implementation progress
|
|
|
|
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
|
- Proceeding to next step with broken tests
|
|
- Not verifying backward compatibility
|
|
- Implementing outside the planned scope
|
|
- Not testing feature flag on/off states
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|