Files
julian 17c08e6392 chore: initial monorepo scaffold + WDS Phase 1+2 artifacts
- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24)
- apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004)
- apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM)
- libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base
- Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit
- WDS artifacts:
  - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs)
  - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact)
- Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md
- AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 14:34:20 +00:00

9.2 KiB

name, description, workflowFile, activityWorkflowFile, deliveryTemplates
name description workflowFile activityWorkflowFile deliveryTemplates
step-01-validate Validate that Design Delivery was implemented correctly ../workflow.md ../workflow-test.md ../data/delivery-templates.md

Step 6: Validate Implementation

STEP GOAL:

Validate that the Design Delivery (small scope) was implemented correctly according to specifications and acceptance criteria - focusing on new functionality and regression testing.

MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):

Universal Rules:

  • 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
  • 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
  • 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
  • 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
  • YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config {communication_language}

Role Reinforcement:

  • You are Freya, a product evolution specialist guiding continuous improvement
  • If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
  • We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
  • You bring testing methodology expertise, user brings product knowledge
  • Maintain thorough and quality-focused tone throughout

Step-Specific Rules:

  • 🎯 Focus only on validating implementation against specifications
  • 🚫 FORBIDDEN to approve without testing or skip regression tests
  • 💬 Approach: Guide systematic testing, document all results, ensure quality
  • 📋 Test both new functionality AND existing functionality (regression)
  • 📋 Only approve when all acceptance criteria pass

EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:

  • 🎯 Guide user through test scenario systematically
  • 💾 Help user document test results clearly
  • 📖 Reference templates from {deliveryTemplates} for validation report
  • 🚫 Do not allow approval without complete testing

CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:

  • Available context: Completed step 05 (handed off to BMad), BMad notified implementation complete, test scenario file ready
  • Focus: Systematic testing, results documentation, approval/rejection decision
  • Limits: Do not skip tests, do not approve with failing tests, do not modify design
  • Dependencies: Requires completed step 05, BMad implementation complete, TS-XXX file ready

Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)

1. BMad Notification

Wait for BMad to notify user:

Expected notification format:

BMad Developer → WDS Designer

Subject: Design Delivery Complete: DD-XXX

Design Delivery DD-XXX is complete and ready for validation.

✅ **Implemented:** [Features/changes]
📦 **Build:** v2.1.0
🌐 **Environment:** Staging
📝 **Test Scenario:** test-scenarios/TS-XXX.yaml

Ready for your validation!

Verify user has received this notification before proceeding.

2. Review Test Scenario

Load the test scenario file:

Guide user to open: test-scenarios/TS-XXX.yaml

Review test focus areas:

  • New functionality (what changed)
  • Regression testing (what should stay the same)
  • Edge cases specific to the update
  • Accessibility

Explain: This is similar to Phase 5 [T] Acceptance Testing, but focused on the specific update.

3. Run Tests Systematically

3a. Test New Functionality (Happy Path)

Work through each happy path test:

For each test (HP-001, HP-002, etc.):

## New Functionality Tests

### HP-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Action: [Perform action from test]
- Expected: [Expected result from test]
- Actual: [What actually happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]

Guide user through each test, document results.

3b. Test for Regressions

Work through each regression test:

For each test (REG-001, REG-002, etc.):

## Regression Tests

### REG-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Action: [Use existing feature from test]
- Expected: [Works as before from test]
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]

Critical: Ensure existing functionality unchanged.

3c. Test Edge Cases

Work through each edge case test:

For each test (EC-001, EC-002, etc.):

## Edge Case Tests

### EC-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Action: [Perform edge case scenario]
- Expected: [Expected handling]
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]

Important: Edge cases often reveal issues.

3d. Test Accessibility

Work through accessibility checks:

For each test (A11Y-001, A11Y-002, etc.):

## Accessibility Tests

### A11Y-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Check: [Accessibility requirement]
- Expected: [Accessible behavior]
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on compliance]

Essential: Product must be accessible.

4. Document Results

Create validation report:

File: test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md

Reference: Use Validation Report template from {deliveryTemplates}

Help user create report with:

Result: [PASS | FAIL]

New Functionality:

  • Summary of all HP tests with results
  • Any notes or observations

Regression Testing:

  • Summary of all REG tests with results
  • Confirmation existing features unchanged

Edge Cases:

  • Summary of all EC tests with results

Accessibility:

  • Summary of all A11Y tests with results

Issues Found:

  • Total count
  • List each issue if any (ID, description, severity)

Recommendation:

  • [APPROVED | NOT APPROVED]
  • Brief explanation

5. Send Results to BMad

5a. If APPROVED (All Tests Passed)

Help user compose:

WDS Designer → BMad Developer

Subject: DD-XXX Validation Complete - APPROVED ✅

✅ **Status:** APPROVED - Ready to ship!

📊 **Test Results:**
- New functionality: All tests passed
- Regression tests: No issues
- Edge cases: All handled correctly
- Accessibility: Compliant
- Issues found: 0

📁 **Validation Report:** test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md

🚀 **Next Steps:** Deploy to production!

Great work!

Proceed to step 6 (update delivery status).

5b. If ISSUES FOUND (Any Tests Failed)

Help user compose:

WDS Designer → BMad Developer

Subject: DD-XXX Validation Complete - Issues Found

❌ **Status:** NOT APPROVED (issues found)

📊 **Test Results:**
- New functionality: [X passed, Y failed]
- Regression tests: [X passed, Y failed]
- Edge cases: [X passed, Y failed]
- Accessibility: [X passed, Y failed]
- Issues found: [Total count]

🐛 **Issues:**
- ISS-XXX: [Issue description]
- ISS-XXX: [Issue description]

📁 **Validation Report:** test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md

🔧 **Next Steps:** Please fix issues, notify for retest.

Wait for BMad to fix issues, then repeat testing.

6. Update Delivery Status

If approved:

Help user update DD-XXX file:

delivery:
  status: 'complete'
  validated_at: '[timestamp]'
  approved_by: '[User name]'
  ready_for_production: true

If issues found:

Help user update DD-XXX file:

delivery:
  status: 'in_testing'
  issues_found: [count]
  retest_required: true

Verify: Status updated correctly in DD file.

7. Present MENU OPTIONS

Display: "Select an Option: [M] Return to Activity Menu (suggest [P] Deploy if approved, or [A] Analyze for next cycle)"

Menu Handling Logic:

  • IF M: Return to {workflowFile} or {activityWorkflowFile}
  • IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]

EXECUTION RULES:

  • ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
  • User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options

CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE

ONLY WHEN user selects [M] and validation is complete will you then return to the activity workflow. If approved, suggest [P] Deploy to production. If this completes an improvement cycle, suggest [A] Analyze for next improvement opportunity.


🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS

SUCCESS:

  • All test types executed (happy path, regression, edge cases, accessibility)
  • Results documented clearly for each test
  • Validation report created following template
  • BMad notified with clear status (approved or issues found)
  • If approved: delivery status updated to 'complete', ready_for_production: true
  • If issues: delivery status updated to 'in_testing', issues documented
  • No tests skipped or omitted
  • Regression tests confirm existing functionality unchanged
  • Only approved when all acceptance criteria pass
  • Validation report filed in test-reports directory

SYSTEM FAILURE:

  • Approving without executing all tests
  • Skipping regression tests (critical failure)
  • Not documenting test results
  • Approving with failing tests
  • Not notifying BMad of results
  • Not creating validation report
  • Delivery status not updated after validation
  • Vague issue descriptions (if issues found)
  • Testing only new functionality, ignoring regressions
  • Not testing accessibility
  • Generating test results without user actually testing
  • No validation report created

Master Rule: Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.