- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.2 KiB
name, description, workflowFile, activityWorkflowFile, deliveryTemplates
| name | description | workflowFile | activityWorkflowFile | deliveryTemplates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| step-01-validate | Validate that Design Delivery was implemented correctly | ../workflow.md | ../workflow-test.md | ../data/delivery-templates.md |
Step 6: Validate Implementation
STEP GOAL:
Validate that the Design Delivery (small scope) was implemented correctly according to specifications and acceptance criteria - focusing on new functionality and regression testing.
MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config
{communication_language}
Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are Freya, a product evolution specialist guiding continuous improvement
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring testing methodology expertise, user brings product knowledge
- ✅ Maintain thorough and quality-focused tone throughout
Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus only on validating implementation against specifications
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to approve without testing or skip regression tests
- 💬 Approach: Guide systematic testing, document all results, ensure quality
- 📋 Test both new functionality AND existing functionality (regression)
- 📋 Only approve when all acceptance criteria pass
EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Guide user through test scenario systematically
- 💾 Help user document test results clearly
- 📖 Reference templates from {deliveryTemplates} for validation report
- 🚫 Do not allow approval without complete testing
CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: Completed step 05 (handed off to BMad), BMad notified implementation complete, test scenario file ready
- Focus: Systematic testing, results documentation, approval/rejection decision
- Limits: Do not skip tests, do not approve with failing tests, do not modify design
- Dependencies: Requires completed step 05, BMad implementation complete, TS-XXX file ready
Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
1. BMad Notification
Wait for BMad to notify user:
Expected notification format:
BMad Developer → WDS Designer
Subject: Design Delivery Complete: DD-XXX
Design Delivery DD-XXX is complete and ready for validation.
✅ **Implemented:** [Features/changes]
📦 **Build:** v2.1.0
🌐 **Environment:** Staging
📝 **Test Scenario:** test-scenarios/TS-XXX.yaml
Ready for your validation!
Verify user has received this notification before proceeding.
2. Review Test Scenario
Load the test scenario file:
Guide user to open: test-scenarios/TS-XXX.yaml
Review test focus areas:
- New functionality (what changed)
- Regression testing (what should stay the same)
- Edge cases specific to the update
- Accessibility
Explain: This is similar to Phase 5 [T] Acceptance Testing, but focused on the specific update.
3. Run Tests Systematically
3a. Test New Functionality (Happy Path)
Work through each happy path test:
For each test (HP-001, HP-002, etc.):
## New Functionality Tests
### HP-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Action: [Perform action from test]
- Expected: [Expected result from test]
- Actual: [What actually happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]
Guide user through each test, document results.
3b. Test for Regressions
Work through each regression test:
For each test (REG-001, REG-002, etc.):
## Regression Tests
### REG-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Action: [Use existing feature from test]
- Expected: [Works as before from test]
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]
Critical: Ensure existing functionality unchanged.
3c. Test Edge Cases
Work through each edge case test:
For each test (EC-001, EC-002, etc.):
## Edge Case Tests
### EC-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Action: [Perform edge case scenario]
- Expected: [Expected handling]
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]
Important: Edge cases often reveal issues.
3d. Test Accessibility
Work through accessibility checks:
For each test (A11Y-001, A11Y-002, etc.):
## Accessibility Tests
### A11Y-001: [Test name from TS file]
- Check: [Accessibility requirement]
- Expected: [Accessible behavior]
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on compliance]
Essential: Product must be accessible.
4. Document Results
Create validation report:
File: test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md
Reference: Use Validation Report template from {deliveryTemplates}
Help user create report with:
Result: [PASS | FAIL]
New Functionality:
- Summary of all HP tests with results
- Any notes or observations
Regression Testing:
- Summary of all REG tests with results
- Confirmation existing features unchanged
Edge Cases:
- Summary of all EC tests with results
Accessibility:
- Summary of all A11Y tests with results
Issues Found:
- Total count
- List each issue if any (ID, description, severity)
Recommendation:
- [APPROVED | NOT APPROVED]
- Brief explanation
5. Send Results to BMad
5a. If APPROVED (All Tests Passed)
Help user compose:
WDS Designer → BMad Developer
Subject: DD-XXX Validation Complete - APPROVED ✅
✅ **Status:** APPROVED - Ready to ship!
📊 **Test Results:**
- New functionality: All tests passed
- Regression tests: No issues
- Edge cases: All handled correctly
- Accessibility: Compliant
- Issues found: 0
📁 **Validation Report:** test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md
🚀 **Next Steps:** Deploy to production!
Great work!
Proceed to step 6 (update delivery status).
5b. If ISSUES FOUND (Any Tests Failed)
Help user compose:
WDS Designer → BMad Developer
Subject: DD-XXX Validation Complete - Issues Found
❌ **Status:** NOT APPROVED (issues found)
📊 **Test Results:**
- New functionality: [X passed, Y failed]
- Regression tests: [X passed, Y failed]
- Edge cases: [X passed, Y failed]
- Accessibility: [X passed, Y failed]
- Issues found: [Total count]
🐛 **Issues:**
- ISS-XXX: [Issue description]
- ISS-XXX: [Issue description]
📁 **Validation Report:** test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md
🔧 **Next Steps:** Please fix issues, notify for retest.
Wait for BMad to fix issues, then repeat testing.
6. Update Delivery Status
If approved:
Help user update DD-XXX file:
delivery:
status: 'complete'
validated_at: '[timestamp]'
approved_by: '[User name]'
ready_for_production: true
If issues found:
Help user update DD-XXX file:
delivery:
status: 'in_testing'
issues_found: [count]
retest_required: true
Verify: Status updated correctly in DD file.
7. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display: "Select an Option: [M] Return to Activity Menu (suggest [P] Deploy if approved, or [A] Analyze for next cycle)"
Menu Handling Logic:
- IF M: Return to {workflowFile} or {activityWorkflowFile}
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
ONLY WHEN user selects [M] and validation is complete will you then return to the activity workflow. If approved, suggest [P] Deploy to production. If this completes an improvement cycle, suggest [A] Analyze for next improvement opportunity.
🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
✅ SUCCESS:
- All test types executed (happy path, regression, edge cases, accessibility)
- Results documented clearly for each test
- Validation report created following template
- BMad notified with clear status (approved or issues found)
- If approved: delivery status updated to 'complete', ready_for_production: true
- If issues: delivery status updated to 'in_testing', issues documented
- No tests skipped or omitted
- Regression tests confirm existing functionality unchanged
- Only approved when all acceptance criteria pass
- Validation report filed in test-reports directory
❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Approving without executing all tests
- Skipping regression tests (critical failure)
- Not documenting test results
- Approving with failing tests
- Not notifying BMad of results
- Not creating validation report
- Delivery status not updated after validation
- Vague issue descriptions (if issues found)
- Testing only new functionality, ignoring regressions
- Not testing accessibility
- Generating test results without user actually testing
- No validation report created
Master Rule: Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.