- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
338 lines
9.2 KiB
Markdown
338 lines
9.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-01-validate'
|
|
description: 'Validate that Design Delivery was implemented correctly'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
workflowFile: '../workflow.md'
|
|
activityWorkflowFile: '../workflow-test.md'
|
|
|
|
# Data References
|
|
deliveryTemplates: '../data/delivery-templates.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 6: Validate Implementation
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
|
|
Validate that the Design Delivery (small scope) was implemented correctly according to specifications and acceptance criteria - focusing on new functionality and regression testing.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
|
|
- ✅ You are Freya, a product evolution specialist guiding continuous improvement
|
|
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- ✅ You bring testing methodology expertise, user brings product knowledge
|
|
- ✅ Maintain thorough and quality-focused tone throughout
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Focus only on validating implementation against specifications
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to approve without testing or skip regression tests
|
|
- 💬 Approach: Guide systematic testing, document all results, ensure quality
|
|
- 📋 Test both new functionality AND existing functionality (regression)
|
|
- 📋 Only approve when all acceptance criteria pass
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Guide user through test scenario systematically
|
|
- 💾 Help user document test results clearly
|
|
- 📖 Reference templates from {deliveryTemplates} for validation report
|
|
- 🚫 Do not allow approval without complete testing
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
|
|
- Available context: Completed step 05 (handed off to BMad), BMad notified implementation complete, test scenario file ready
|
|
- Focus: Systematic testing, results documentation, approval/rejection decision
|
|
- Limits: Do not skip tests, do not approve with failing tests, do not modify design
|
|
- Dependencies: Requires completed step 05, BMad implementation complete, TS-XXX file ready
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. BMad Notification
|
|
|
|
**Wait for BMad to notify user:**
|
|
|
|
Expected notification format:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
BMad Developer → WDS Designer
|
|
|
|
Subject: Design Delivery Complete: DD-XXX
|
|
|
|
Design Delivery DD-XXX is complete and ready for validation.
|
|
|
|
✅ **Implemented:** [Features/changes]
|
|
📦 **Build:** v2.1.0
|
|
🌐 **Environment:** Staging
|
|
📝 **Test Scenario:** test-scenarios/TS-XXX.yaml
|
|
|
|
Ready for your validation!
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Verify user has received this notification before proceeding.**
|
|
|
|
### 2. Review Test Scenario
|
|
|
|
**Load the test scenario file:**
|
|
|
|
Guide user to open: `test-scenarios/TS-XXX.yaml`
|
|
|
|
**Review test focus areas:**
|
|
- New functionality (what changed)
|
|
- Regression testing (what should stay the same)
|
|
- Edge cases specific to the update
|
|
- Accessibility
|
|
|
|
**Explain:** This is similar to Phase 5 [T] Acceptance Testing, but focused on the specific update.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Run Tests Systematically
|
|
|
|
#### 3a. Test New Functionality (Happy Path)
|
|
|
|
**Work through each happy path test:**
|
|
|
|
For each test (HP-001, HP-002, etc.):
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## New Functionality Tests
|
|
|
|
### HP-001: [Test name from TS file]
|
|
- Action: [Perform action from test]
|
|
- Expected: [Expected result from test]
|
|
- Actual: [What actually happened - USER PROVIDES]
|
|
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Guide user through each test, document results.**
|
|
|
|
#### 3b. Test for Regressions
|
|
|
|
**Work through each regression test:**
|
|
|
|
For each test (REG-001, REG-002, etc.):
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Regression Tests
|
|
|
|
### REG-001: [Test name from TS file]
|
|
- Action: [Use existing feature from test]
|
|
- Expected: [Works as before from test]
|
|
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
|
|
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Critical:** Ensure existing functionality unchanged.
|
|
|
|
#### 3c. Test Edge Cases
|
|
|
|
**Work through each edge case test:**
|
|
|
|
For each test (EC-001, EC-002, etc.):
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Edge Case Tests
|
|
|
|
### EC-001: [Test name from TS file]
|
|
- Action: [Perform edge case scenario]
|
|
- Expected: [Expected handling]
|
|
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
|
|
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on match]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Important:** Edge cases often reveal issues.
|
|
|
|
#### 3d. Test Accessibility
|
|
|
|
**Work through accessibility checks:**
|
|
|
|
For each test (A11Y-001, A11Y-002, etc.):
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Accessibility Tests
|
|
|
|
### A11Y-001: [Test name from TS file]
|
|
- Check: [Accessibility requirement]
|
|
- Expected: [Accessible behavior]
|
|
- Actual: [What happened - USER PROVIDES]
|
|
- Result: [PASS | FAIL - based on compliance]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Essential:** Product must be accessible.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Document Results
|
|
|
|
**Create validation report:**
|
|
|
|
**File:** `test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md`
|
|
|
|
**Reference:** Use Validation Report template from {deliveryTemplates}
|
|
|
|
Help user create report with:
|
|
|
|
**Result:** [PASS | FAIL]
|
|
|
|
**New Functionality:**
|
|
- Summary of all HP tests with results
|
|
- Any notes or observations
|
|
|
|
**Regression Testing:**
|
|
- Summary of all REG tests with results
|
|
- Confirmation existing features unchanged
|
|
|
|
**Edge Cases:**
|
|
- Summary of all EC tests with results
|
|
|
|
**Accessibility:**
|
|
- Summary of all A11Y tests with results
|
|
|
|
**Issues Found:**
|
|
- Total count
|
|
- List each issue if any (ID, description, severity)
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:**
|
|
- [APPROVED | NOT APPROVED]
|
|
- Brief explanation
|
|
|
|
### 5. Send Results to BMad
|
|
|
|
#### 5a. If APPROVED (All Tests Passed)
|
|
|
|
Help user compose:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
WDS Designer → BMad Developer
|
|
|
|
Subject: DD-XXX Validation Complete - APPROVED ✅
|
|
|
|
✅ **Status:** APPROVED - Ready to ship!
|
|
|
|
📊 **Test Results:**
|
|
- New functionality: All tests passed
|
|
- Regression tests: No issues
|
|
- Edge cases: All handled correctly
|
|
- Accessibility: Compliant
|
|
- Issues found: 0
|
|
|
|
📁 **Validation Report:** test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md
|
|
|
|
🚀 **Next Steps:** Deploy to production!
|
|
|
|
Great work!
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Proceed to step 6 (update delivery status).**
|
|
|
|
#### 5b. If ISSUES FOUND (Any Tests Failed)
|
|
|
|
Help user compose:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
WDS Designer → BMad Developer
|
|
|
|
Subject: DD-XXX Validation Complete - Issues Found
|
|
|
|
❌ **Status:** NOT APPROVED (issues found)
|
|
|
|
📊 **Test Results:**
|
|
- New functionality: [X passed, Y failed]
|
|
- Regression tests: [X passed, Y failed]
|
|
- Edge cases: [X passed, Y failed]
|
|
- Accessibility: [X passed, Y failed]
|
|
- Issues found: [Total count]
|
|
|
|
🐛 **Issues:**
|
|
- ISS-XXX: [Issue description]
|
|
- ISS-XXX: [Issue description]
|
|
|
|
📁 **Validation Report:** test-reports/TR-XXX-DD-XXX-validation.md
|
|
|
|
🔧 **Next Steps:** Please fix issues, notify for retest.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Wait for BMad to fix issues, then repeat testing.**
|
|
|
|
### 6. Update Delivery Status
|
|
|
|
**If approved:**
|
|
|
|
Help user update DD-XXX file:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
delivery:
|
|
status: 'complete'
|
|
validated_at: '[timestamp]'
|
|
approved_by: '[User name]'
|
|
ready_for_production: true
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**If issues found:**
|
|
|
|
Help user update DD-XXX file:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
delivery:
|
|
status: 'in_testing'
|
|
issues_found: [count]
|
|
retest_required: true
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Verify:** Status updated correctly in DD file.
|
|
|
|
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [M] Return to Activity Menu (suggest [P] Deploy if approved, or [A] Analyze for next cycle)"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
- IF M: Return to {workflowFile} or {activityWorkflowFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
|
|
ONLY WHEN user selects [M] and validation is complete will you then return to the activity workflow. If approved, suggest [P] Deploy to production. If this completes an improvement cycle, suggest [A] Analyze for next improvement opportunity.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
|
- All test types executed (happy path, regression, edge cases, accessibility)
|
|
- Results documented clearly for each test
|
|
- Validation report created following template
|
|
- BMad notified with clear status (approved or issues found)
|
|
- If approved: delivery status updated to 'complete', ready_for_production: true
|
|
- If issues: delivery status updated to 'in_testing', issues documented
|
|
- No tests skipped or omitted
|
|
- Regression tests confirm existing functionality unchanged
|
|
- Only approved when all acceptance criteria pass
|
|
- Validation report filed in test-reports directory
|
|
|
|
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
|
- Approving without executing all tests
|
|
- Skipping regression tests (critical failure)
|
|
- Not documenting test results
|
|
- Approving with failing tests
|
|
- Not notifying BMad of results
|
|
- Not creating validation report
|
|
- Delivery status not updated after validation
|
|
- Vague issue descriptions (if issues found)
|
|
- Testing only new functionality, ignoring regressions
|
|
- Not testing accessibility
|
|
- Generating test results without user actually testing
|
|
- No validation report created
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|