julian
17c08e6392
- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
131 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
131 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-01-scan-existing'
|
|
description: 'Scan existing design system components to find matches for the current component type'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
nextStepFile: './step-02-compare-attributes.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 1: Scan Existing Components
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
|
|
Find all components in the design system that match the current component type. Scan the design system folder, extract component metadata, and build a candidate list for comparison.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
|
|
- ✅ You are the Design System Architect guiding design system creation and maintenance
|
|
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- ✅ You bring design system expertise and component analysis, user brings design knowledge and project context
|
|
- ✅ Maintain systematic and analytical tone throughout
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on this step's specific goal — do not skip ahead
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to jump to later steps before this step is complete
|
|
- 💬 Approach: Systematic execution with clear reporting
|
|
- 📋 All outputs must be documented and presented to user
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Execute each instruction in the sequence below
|
|
- 💾 Document all findings and decisions
|
|
- 📖 Present results to user before proceeding
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip instructions or optimize the sequence
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
|
|
- Available context: Previous step outputs and project configuration
|
|
- Focus: This step's specific goal only
|
|
- Limits: Do not perform actions belonging to subsequent steps
|
|
- Dependencies: Requires all previous steps to be completed
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. Read Design System Folder
|
|
|
|
Scan design system components:
|
|
- Read all files in `D-Design-System/components/`
|
|
- Parse component type from each file
|
|
- Filter by matching type
|
|
|
|
### 2. Extract Component Metadata
|
|
|
|
For each matching component, extract:
|
|
- Component ID (e.g., `btn-001`)
|
|
- Variants (e.g., primary, secondary, ghost)
|
|
- States (e.g., default, hover, active, disabled)
|
|
- Key styling attributes
|
|
- Usage count (how many pages use it)
|
|
|
|
### 3. Build Candidate List
|
|
|
|
Present matching components to user with full metadata.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Handle Edge Cases
|
|
|
|
**No matching components found:** Route to `step-08b-create-new-component.md`
|
|
|
|
**Design system empty:** Route to `step-08a-initialize-design-system.md`
|
|
|
|
**Multiple type matches:** Continue to comparison for each candidate.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Pass Data to Next Step
|
|
|
|
Pass candidate list to comparison step:
|
|
- Component IDs
|
|
- Full metadata
|
|
- Current component specification
|
|
|
|
### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Compare Attributes"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
|
|
- IF C: Update design log, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#6-present-menu-options)
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects the appropriate option
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions — always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
|
|
ONLY WHEN [C continue option is selected and scan is complete with candidate list built], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute the next step.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
|
|
|
- Step goal achieved completely
|
|
- All instructions executed in sequence
|
|
- Results documented and presented to user
|
|
- User confirmed before proceeding
|
|
- Design log updated
|
|
|
|
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
|
|
|
- Skipping any instruction in the sequence
|
|
- Generating content without user input
|
|
- Jumping ahead to later steps
|
|
- Not presenting results to user
|
|
- Proceeding without user confirmation
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|