- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
157 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
157 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-05-cross-document-coherence'
|
|
description: 'Validate all trigger map documents are coherent as a set'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
activityWorkflowFile: '../workflow-validate.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 5: Cross-Document Coherence Validation
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
|
|
Verify all trigger map documents are coherent as a set - hub, personas, key insights, and feature impact tell a consistent story with matching terminology, coherent narrative, working cross-references, and accurate Mermaid diagram. Compile final validation report.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
|
|
- ✅ You are a Validation specialist reviewing trigger map completeness, consistency, and strategic alignment
|
|
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- ✅ You bring validation methodology expertise, user brings product knowledge
|
|
- ✅ Maintain thorough and quality-focused tone throughout
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Focus on cross-document coherence and final validation summary
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to approve if persona names differ between documents
|
|
- 💬 Approach: Systematic cross-document comparison and final report compilation
|
|
- 📋 Check: terminology, narrative coherence, cross-references, Mermaid diagram accuracy
|
|
- 📋 Compile results from ALL 5 validation steps into final report
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Verify coherence across all documents as a set
|
|
- 💾 Save final validation report to {output_folder}/B-Trigger-Map/validation-report.md
|
|
- 📖 Compile all 5 validation step results
|
|
- 🚫 Do not skip Mermaid diagram verification
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
|
|
- Available context: All trigger map documents and all previous validation results
|
|
- Focus: Cross-document coherence and final validation summary
|
|
- Limits: This is the LAST validation step - must produce comprehensive report
|
|
- Dependencies: Requires all previous validation steps completed
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. Terminology Consistency
|
|
|
|
- Persona names identical across all documents
|
|
- Business goal names identical across all documents
|
|
- Priority emojis consistent (same emoji = same meaning)
|
|
- Driving force language consistent (same force = same wording)
|
|
|
|
### 2. Narrative Coherence
|
|
|
|
- Hub document accurately summarizes persona docs
|
|
- Key insights derive from actual trigger map data (not invented)
|
|
- Flywheel logic makes causal sense (P1 -> P2 -> P3 chain)
|
|
- Design implications flow from insights (not generic advice)
|
|
|
|
### 3. Cross-References
|
|
|
|
- All documents link back to hub (00-trigger-map.md)
|
|
- Hub links to all sub-documents
|
|
- Navigation is bidirectional
|
|
- No broken links
|
|
|
|
### 4. Mermaid Diagram
|
|
|
|
- Diagram reflects actual data (not a rough sketch)
|
|
- All personas present in diagram
|
|
- All business goals present in diagram
|
|
- Connections match driving force assignments
|
|
- Renders correctly (no syntax errors)
|
|
|
|
### 5. Compile Final Validation Report
|
|
|
|
Compile results from all 5 validation steps:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
## Phase 2 Validation Report
|
|
|
|
**Project:** {project_name}
|
|
**Date:** [date]
|
|
**Documents validated:** [N]
|
|
|
|
### Results Summary
|
|
| Check | Status | Issues |
|
|
|-------|--------|--------|
|
|
| Target Group Coverage | pass/warning/fail | [summary] |
|
|
| Prioritization Integrity | pass/warning/fail | [summary] |
|
|
| Persona Consistency | pass/warning/fail | [summary] |
|
|
| Feature Impact Alignment | pass/warning/fail | [summary] |
|
|
| Cross-Document Coherence | pass/warning/fail | [summary] |
|
|
|
|
### Critical Issues (must fix)
|
|
[list or "None"]
|
|
|
|
### Warnings (should fix)
|
|
[list or "None"]
|
|
|
|
### Recommendations
|
|
[list or "All clear"]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Save report to `{output_folder}/B-Trigger-Map/validation-report.md`
|
|
|
|
### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [M] Return to Activity Menu"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
- IF M: Return to {activityWorkflowFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
|
|
This is the LAST step in the validation workflow. ONLY the [M] Return option is available. Validation report must be saved before completing.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
|
- Terminology consistency verified across all documents
|
|
- Narrative coherence checked
|
|
- Cross-references verified (bidirectional)
|
|
- Mermaid diagram verified against actual data
|
|
- Final validation report compiled from all 5 steps
|
|
- Report saved to correct location
|
|
- Critical issues, warnings, and recommendations clearly listed
|
|
- Only [M] Return option available (last step)
|
|
|
|
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
|
- Not checking terminology across documents
|
|
- Not verifying Mermaid diagram accuracy
|
|
- Not compiling results from all 5 steps
|
|
- Not saving validation report
|
|
- Missing critical issues in report
|
|
- Offering [C] Continue when there is no next step
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|