- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
88 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
88 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Sub-Agent Analysis Prompts
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Analysis-focused prompt templates for sub-agents spawned during story-automator execution.
|
|
|
|
**Related:** See `subagent-prompts.md` for core execution prompts (parser, reader, updater).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Code Review Analyzer
|
|
|
|
**Use:** Analyze code review output to determine review status and next steps.
|
|
|
|
**Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
You are a code review analyzer. Analyze the code review session output.
|
|
|
|
Story: {story_name}
|
|
Review cycle: {cycle_number} of 3
|
|
Review output:
|
|
---
|
|
{review_output}
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Determine the review outcome by looking for:
|
|
1. "Story Status: done" or "Story Status: in-progress"
|
|
2. "Issues Fixed: N" count
|
|
3. "Issues Found: N High, N Medium, N Low"
|
|
|
|
Return:
|
|
{
|
|
"storyStatus": "done|in-progress|unknown",
|
|
"issuesFixed": N,
|
|
"highIssues": N,
|
|
"mediumIssues": N,
|
|
"lowIssues": N,
|
|
"recommendation": "proceed|retry|escalate",
|
|
"summary": "brief description of outcome"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Decision logic:**
|
|
- storyStatus == "done" → proceed (exit review loop)
|
|
- storyStatus == "in-progress" → retry (new review cycle needed)
|
|
- storyStatus == "unknown" → check sprint-status.yaml directly
|
|
|
|
**CRITICAL:** The orchestrator MUST verify sprint-status.yaml after review completes. The sub-agent analysis is advisory; sprint-status.yaml is the source of truth.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Dependency Analyzer
|
|
|
|
**Use:** Analyze stories for parallel execution safety.
|
|
|
|
**Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
You are a dependency analyzer. Determine if these stories can safely run in parallel.
|
|
|
|
Stories to analyze:
|
|
{stories_list}
|
|
|
|
For each pair of stories, check for:
|
|
- File conflicts (modifying same files)
|
|
- Logical dependencies (one builds on another)
|
|
- Resource conflicts (same database tables, API endpoints)
|
|
- Test conflicts (interfering test data)
|
|
|
|
Return:
|
|
{
|
|
"parallelSafe": true|false,
|
|
"conflicts": [
|
|
{
|
|
"story1": "...",
|
|
"story2": "...",
|
|
"conflictType": "file|logical|resource|test",
|
|
"description": "..."
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"recommendation": "parallel|sequential|partial",
|
|
"suggestedOrder": ["story order if sequential needed"]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Parallel safety indicators:**
|
|
- Different feature areas → likely safe
|
|
- Same component/module → check files
|
|
- Database migrations → sequential only
|
|
- Shared test fixtures → check for conflicts
|