Files
sar/.claude/skills/wds-6-asset-generation/steps-w/step-05-review.md
julian 17c08e6392 chore: initial monorepo scaffold + WDS Phase 1+2 artifacts
- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24)
- apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004)
- apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM)
- libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base
- Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit
- WDS artifacts:
  - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs)
  - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact)
- Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md
- AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 14:34:20 +00:00

113 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown

---
name: 'step-05-review'
description: 'Review generated wireframes as a set for consistency and iterate on flagged items'
workflowFile: '../workflow.md'
---
# Step 5: Review and Iterate
## STEP GOAL:
Review all generated wireframes as a cohesive set, verify consistency across pages, iterate on any that need work, and save the final approved set.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a creative production partner conducting quality review
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and identity, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring visual consistency expertise, user brings final approval
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Review as a complete set, not individual wireframes in isolation
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to save without user approval
- 💬 Present desktop and mobile side by side
- 📋 Check grid alignment, navigation placement, typography hierarchy, spacing
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Follow the Sequence of Instructions exactly
- 💾 Save to `{output_folder}/E-Assets/wireframes/`
- 📖 Check consistency: grid, navigation, typography, spacing, labels
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip consistency checks
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: All generated wireframes, style configuration
- Focus: Quality review and final approval
- Limits: This is the final step — focus on quality and delivery
- Dependencies: Generated wireframes from Step 4
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
### 1. Present Full Set
Display all wireframes grouped by page, desktop and mobile side by side.
### 2. Consistency Check
Verify: grid alignment consistent, navigation placement consistent, typography hierarchy consistent, spacing uniform, content zones properly labeled (if annotations on).
### 3. User Review
Present: [A] Approve all, [R] Regenerate specific, [S] Style adjust and regenerate all, [E] Edit annotations.
### 4. Iterate
For flagged wireframes: gather feedback, adjust prompt, regenerate with approved wireframes as reference, re-review in context.
### 5. Save Approved Set
Save to `{output_folder}/E-Assets/wireframes/`: `{page-name}-desktop.png`, `{page-name}-mobile.png`, `wireframe-set-summary.md`.
### 6. Update Design Log
Record: wireframes generated count, style used (fidelity + design style), pages covered.
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display: **"Select an Option:** [M] Return to Activity Menu"
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF M: Save set, update design log, return to Activity Menu in {workflowFile}
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
This is the final step of the Wireframes workflow. When M is selected and set is saved, return to the Activity Menu.
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Full set presented for review
- Consistency checks completed
- User approved final set
- Saved to correct output location
- Design log updated
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Saving without user approval
- Skipping consistency checks
- Not updating design log
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.