- Nx 22.7 monorepo (pnpm 11.1, TypeScript 5.9, Node 24) - apps/api: NestJS 11 (CJS conforme CODING-RULES.md PGD-DB-004) - apps/web: React 19 + Vite 8 (ESM) - libs/shared/api-interface: Zod contract base - Docker Compose dev: Postgres 18, Valkey 8, MinIO, Mailpit - WDS artifacts: - design-artifacts/A-Product-Brief/ (5 docs canônicos + 16 dialogs) - design-artifacts/B-Trigger-Map/ (hub + 4 personas + feature impact) - Stack canon: STACK.md v2.2 + CODING-RULES.md v2.0 + brand.md - AGENTS.md + README.md como entrada para devs/agentes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
186 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
186 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: 'step-05-prioritization'
|
|
description: 'Workshop 4: Prioritize business goals, target groups, and driving forces'
|
|
|
|
# File References
|
|
nextStepFile: './step-06a-extract-features.md'
|
|
activityWorkflowFile: '../workflow.md'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Step 11: Workshop 4 - Prioritization
|
|
|
|
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
|
|
Facilitate Workshop 4 to prioritize business goals, objectives, target groups, and driving forces through challenged reasoning, creating a clear design focus statement.
|
|
|
|
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
|
|
### Universal Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
|
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
|
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
|
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
|
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
|
|
|
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
|
|
- ✅ You are Saga the Analyst - challenging assumptions, seeking clarity
|
|
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
|
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
|
- ✅ You bring structured facilitation and pattern recognition, user brings business knowledge and user insight
|
|
- ✅ Work together as equals in a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship
|
|
|
|
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Focus on making hard choices with clear reasoning
|
|
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to accept prioritization without challenging the reasoning
|
|
- 💬 Approach: For each choice, ask "Why is X more important than Y?"
|
|
- 📋 Push for clear reasoning to prevent "gut feel" prioritization
|
|
- 📋 Create MoSCoW-style focus statement (Must/Should/Could address)
|
|
|
|
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
|
|
- 🎯 Challenge every priority decision with "why" questions
|
|
- 💾 Store prioritized_visions, prioritized_objectives, prioritized_groups, prioritized_drivers, focus_statement
|
|
- 📖 Capture reasoning alongside rankings
|
|
- 🚫 Do not accept rankings without documented rationale
|
|
|
|
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
|
|
- Available context: Vision, objectives, personas, driving forces from previous workshops
|
|
- Focus: Priority ranking with reasoning for all elements
|
|
- Limits: Every ranking must have documented reasoning
|
|
- Dependencies: Requires completed Workshop 3 with confirmed driving forces
|
|
|
|
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
|
|
|
### 1. Introduce Workshop
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
"**Workshop 4: Prioritization**
|
|
|
|
Now we make the hard choices. We'll prioritize:
|
|
1. Business goals (visions)
|
|
2. Objectives under each goal
|
|
3. Target groups
|
|
4. Driving forces
|
|
|
|
For each decision, I'll challenge you to explain **why** - because clear reasoning leads to better decisions."
|
|
|
|
### 2. Prioritize Business Goals
|
|
|
|
If multiple visions exist, present them and ask which is most critical right now. Challenge the choice: "Why is {{chosen_vision}} more important than {{other_vision}}?"
|
|
|
|
Capture reasoning. Build ranked list. Store prioritized_visions.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Prioritize Objectives
|
|
|
|
Present objectives under top goal. Ask which is most important to achieve first - which one would have the biggest impact or unlock the others.
|
|
|
|
Challenge the choice with "why" questions. Continue ranking with reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Store prioritized_objectives.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Prioritize Target Groups
|
|
|
|
Present target groups with reference to top objective.
|
|
|
|
Ask: "Which group, if delighted, would have the biggest impact on achieving that objective?"
|
|
|
|
Challenge: "Why is {{chosen_group}} more important than {{other_group}} for this objective?"
|
|
|
|
Push for clear reasoning. Build ranked list.
|
|
|
|
Ask: "The top group gets most design attention. Does this ranking reflect your strategy?"
|
|
|
|
Store prioritized_groups.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Prioritize Drivers Per Group
|
|
|
|
For top 2-3 groups, present their positive and negative drivers.
|
|
|
|
Ask: "Rank the top 3-5 drivers this group cares most about. Remember: negative drivers often have more weight (loss aversion)."
|
|
|
|
Help rank drivers with reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Store prioritized_drivers.
|
|
|
|
### 6. Create Focus Statement
|
|
|
|
Synthesize into focus statement:
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
"**Your Design Focus:**
|
|
|
|
**Primary Group:** {{top_group.name}}
|
|
**Secondary:** {{second_group.name}}
|
|
|
|
**Must Address:**
|
|
{{must_address_drivers}}
|
|
|
|
**Should Address:**
|
|
{{should_address_drivers}}
|
|
|
|
**Could Address (if time permits):**
|
|
{{could_address_drivers}}"
|
|
|
|
Ask: "Does this focus feel right? This guides all feature decisions."
|
|
|
|
Store focus_statement.
|
|
|
|
### 7. Present Workshop Summary
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
"**Workshop 4 Complete!**
|
|
|
|
**Your Strategic Focus:**
|
|
- Design primarily for **{{top_group.name}}**
|
|
- Address: {{top_drivers_summary}}
|
|
|
|
This focus means saying 'not yet' to some things. That's the power of prioritization.
|
|
|
|
Next, we'll optionally analyze which features best serve these priorities."
|
|
|
|
Store all prioritized outputs.
|
|
|
|
### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Display: "**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Feature Impact Workshop | [M] Return to Activity Menu"
|
|
|
|
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
- IF C: Load and execute {nextStepFile}
|
|
- IF M: Return to {activityWorkflowFile}
|
|
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
|
|
|
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
|
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
|
|
|
ONLY WHEN user selects [C] will you load the next step file. All priorities and focus statement must be confirmed before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
|
|
|
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
|
- Business goals prioritized with reasoning
|
|
- Objectives ranked with reasoning
|
|
- Target groups prioritized with challenged reasoning
|
|
- Driving forces ranked per group with reasoning
|
|
- Focus statement created (Must/Should/Could)
|
|
- Every priority decision has documented "why"
|
|
- User confirmed all rankings and focus statement
|
|
|
|
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
|
- Accepting priorities without "why" reasoning
|
|
- Not challenging priority decisions
|
|
- Allowing "gut feel" prioritization without reasoning
|
|
- Missing focus statement
|
|
- Not capturing reasoning alongside rankings
|
|
- Proceeding without confirmed priorities
|
|
|
|
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|